番茄無(wú)土育苗基質(zhì)配方的研究

2003 M 3 2 j<vÐÐMar. 2003»37 »1 ùJournal of Henan Agricultural University Vol.37 No.1là ° ù:2002-11-10Á “: 2 8 S/þ1 “(012201220)Teº: äÍ <(1956-), 3,¢Ü g ¦, 2 j<vÐ q,V Y ! óÐùîýT.ÓcI|:1000-2340(2003)01-0054-03I Nírâ ìÉ ¥Z¥ùî孫治強(qiáng),趙永英,李勝利,張艷玲(河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)林學(xué)園藝學(xué)院,河南鄭州450002)K1:研究了鋸末為主的復(fù)配基質(zhì)對(duì)番茄幼苗生長(zhǎng)發(fā)育的影響.結(jié)果表明,以腐熟鋸末為主育番茄苗時(shí),不出現(xiàn)幼苗黃化和出苗不齊現(xiàn)象,幼苗前期(28 d以前)生長(zhǎng)緩慢,生長(zhǎng)速度遠(yuǎn)低于對(duì)照;從28 d開(kāi)始,鋸末復(fù)合基質(zhì)中幼苗生長(zhǎng)速度開(kāi)始加快,以 V(鋸末):V(蛭石):V(煤灰)=6:2:2時(shí)表現(xiàn)最優(yōu),42 d時(shí)番茄幼苗與對(duì)照已無(wú)差異.因此,培育42 d左右的番茄幼苗時(shí),腐熟鋸末可替代草炭作為育苗基質(zhì).1oM:鋸末;無(wú)土育苗;基質(zhì);番茄Ïms Ë|:S 641.2 ÓDS M :AStudy on substrate formulation of soilless SeedlingLycopersicum esculentumSUN Zhi-qiang,ZHAO Yong-ying,LISheng-li,ZHANG Yan-ling(College of Forestry and Horticulture ,HenanAgricultural University ,Zhengzhou 450002,China)Abstract:A study was conducted on the effect of the compound substrate with sawdust as the main material on thegrowth and development of Lycopersicum esculentum seedling.The results showed that Lycopersicum esculentum seedlingsowed in coast sawdust germinatedwithout any abnormal phenomenon, but the growth of seedling was slow within 28 dafter sowing and had significant differencewith theCK.While after 28 d, growth of Lycopersicum esculentum seedling insawdust became fast and at 42 d after sowing, therewas no statistically differencebetween seedlings of sawdust and theCK.So sawdust can be the substitute for peat as seedling substrate.Key words:sawdust;soilless seedling;substrates;Lycopersicum esculentum“ -ýÌÄ ¡â¥ vÑ ìî'ùÚ¿r â ì,Xî¹â ìýÌÄ、Á<Ä ë “¥ö1Ù5.¤¹ö¥¯ ¥É Ù vÑ â ì ¥ P¨rT z, s'÷ Kî'Ú¥KÅ 4ûÃĨ.yNS =ÐM? 7Z ¤9É¥ùî.磩ùî ã. T¹'𠥯 ¥É vÑ ¥ P¨rT 1 . äÍ <©ùî ?T¹¤9ÉI NýÌÄâ ìÏ¥¨2 . Ù Û Û© ª¹ 2Z/¼Ì“Ï¥¹ u, R¼ ÜV) Ø BÕ z¥â ìÉ 4 . ¯KÅB祹×, P¨rT 9 4 9¤. T¹BÕ !l , ÷<W,Nì® ÷,Bt 9Á !¥SE ÂF 28 d¼ ì ¯v¹Kª,7 Ov¥ÔÚ、7×、Äשª ?à v,Ð ÉÏVCKz¥) صs ¯A÷. ¯É) ØW¼ ì 3É9 7 SVCµs, îµ·S (M12VCKz,M5M13Q­,VC µ¥¹M6,M9M10 . ª ü,28 d ì - H, Ø ¥1É¥ª +ïv 7 SAC, É¥ ÄX 7 S ,VC¼ ì 3É ü µ ïv 7.35 d¥I N¼ ìÐ21 d28 dM1, Ðv¥µsïv êl,­ M12 ,¼ ì7×Ä×ÐvX Àµµs.M12M5I N¼ ì?à 3É z, Oª µ î v,VC µ¥) Ø ¯¹M6M10 , -Ъ îµ·Sµs (A÷. Vn,lÕ28dª, ÉI N¼ ì 3É¥Bñ×1 H ù, Ø ¥1É¥ª + 7 S¤µr?è,I N¼ ìµ v9É,Ðv¥µ vv êl,µt·S .ÀÑVv.56 2 j < v Ð Ð »37 V2 H ùÉ ¥Z H I N¼ ì 3É¥YTable 2 The effect of different substrates formulation on Lycopersicum esculentum seedling growth at different stage) ØTR21 dÔÚ/cmStem heightÔY/mmStem diameter FW/(g·é-1)DW/(mg·é-1)28 dÔÚ/cmStem heightÔY/mmStem diameter FW/(g·é-1)DW/(mg·é-1)M1 2.37 1.23 0.19 11.17 4.34 1.67 0.54 47.50M2 2.51 1.34 0.20 12.07 4.15 1.68 0.50 44.60M3 2.64 1.27 0.17 11.00 4.51 1.71 0.52 43.73M4 2.45 1.22 0.20 12.13 4.53 1.85 0.52 45.47M5 2.41 1.22 0.24 14.67 4.67 1.89 0.61 49.93M6 2.21 1.23 0.14 9.40 3.67 1.63 0.34 29.80M7 2.65 1.18 0.18 10.80 3.87 1.64 0.43 37.47M8 2.35 1.33 0.19 11.47 4.41 1.82 0.52 46.93M9 2.27 1.11 0.14 9.73 3.92 1.72 0.32 28.00M10 2.40 1.16 0.13 8.53 3.70 1.67 0.33 29.27M11 2.17 1.26 0.18 11.13 4.21 1.75 0.51 43.00M12 2.79 1.27 0.23 14.27 4.91 1.98 0.72 66.07M13 2.40 1.24 0.19 11.93 4.85 1.82 0.60 52.93M14 4.30 1.77 0.41 22.46 7.46 2.53 1.16 95.93) ØTR35 dÔÚ/cmStem heightÔY/mmStem diameter FW/(g·é-1)DW/(mg·é-1)42 dÔÚ/cmStem heightÔY/mmStem diameter FW/(g·é-1)DW/(mg·é-1)M1 7.10 2.54 1.54 132.0 10.90 3.11 3.35 251.0M2 6.39 2.26 1.06 93.8 9.40 2.73 2.79 210.2M3 6.67 2.39 1.31 115.0 12.10 2.97 3.41 252.6M4 7.36 2.59 1.60 138.7 13.63 3.19 4.20 324.0M5 8.26 2.67 1.64 142.5 14.10 3.27 4.55 377.6M6 5.62 1.95 0.81 68.9 9.47 2.93 2.61 200.6M7 7.04 2.16 1.32 116.8 12.19 3.01 3.48 265.6M8 7.73 2.46 1.43 130.1 13.17 3.17 3.51 286.6M9 7.13 2.32 1.37 116.2 13.59 3.15 3.69 294.8M10 6.49 2.38 1.21 107.1 11.53 2.89 3.27 250.8M11 7.09 2.47 1.38 121.3 11.53 3.05 3.94 306.8M12 8.81 2.77 2.09 170.2 15.63 3.59 5.69 430.2M13 7.61 2.49 1.46 128.1 12.69 3.23 4.02 301.2M14 11.31 3.22 2.31 201.9 14.90 3.57 5.42 422.23É42 d¥I N¼ ì,vª Xvvh Ð. îµ) ØÏ, ¯ÉM12VCKª,¼ ì7×Ä×sY VCKµ¥M6) Ø¥2.182.14,7 OÑV v,Ðv Àµµs.¹÷z¹ ßN¼ ì3É f ,9 Ø I N¼ ì¥ ì· ,²T ¯M12Kª,vQ­,=íµs.42 d H, îµ) Øϼ ìÔÚ Àµµs.2.3 É ¥ZI Nî ìÉ ¥YÉ ¥ZI Nî ìÉ ¥YnV3.V3 É ¥ZI Nî ìÉ ¥YTable 3 The effect of different substrates formultion on Lycopersicum esculentum seedling qualit) ØTR M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14GSI 7.13 6.11 6.20 7.58 8.76 6.21 6.56 6.90 6.83 629 8.12 9.88 7.67 10.06ÿ: ì· =(ÔY/ÔÚ)×±éÄ×.Notes:Good seeding index=(stem diameter/stem height)×dryweight.VV3 V A,î ì ù îµ) ØI N¥ ì· GSIûl¿v.É ¥Z­WI N¥ ì· i“v¥µs, ÏM12I N¥ ì· r 9.88,Ðv(10.06)¤Í,cµ ¥É ¥ZϹKÚ, Q¹M5(8.76)M1(8.12).M2¥ ì· K®,ǹ6.11.3 ² Ð) ª ¹öâI N ì H,' ? £¼ ìÈ?èr, À?C ì ¼ ìÛÄC. îµ ¥ÉÏ,V( ):V( F):V( ¿ç)=6:2:2¹Kz,35 42 d H¥I N¼ ìò·SÐvW À(下轉(zhuǎn)第60頁(yè))60 2 j < v Ð Ð »37 3)-70 -20 Hq/,% µ§ÁË s ÿ%¥/.yN i H aF%¥ ¹4. iVñÏ, Ù Ë s ÿ¥ ûÐ ) µ“°¤¥ ó“,' P ? ûBç¥ ) ,Ë s ÿ9íE Û­íK ùüÃ. V ûBç¥ ) ¥ -4/,  ðµ¥$ ÉBüÉË s ÿ%¥ ûHW,µÉBùî.4) k²TV ü, iË s ÿ%Kz¨A i¥ZE, VüÉ i HW,«ÿv ¥ HW . Q -70 , ÂT Àµ Hqº HW = P¨,9 V¨4 -20 i. IÓD: 1 Û .± 3þ¥L.sy×F A.·m¿. ôY± 3þÐ C.Ø:Ø j<vÐñ, 1992.152-171. 2 _ê,î i æ, BZ).± 3þÄ/ ùîÉZ J. 2 j<vÐÐ,2001,35(4):299-302. 3 9CA.± 3þL.Ð$ M. Z: Z SÐ/ ñ,1963.61-73. 4 HANAHAN D.Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmid J.J Mol Biol, 1983,166:557-580. 5 COHEN S N, CHANG A C Y, HSU L.Nonchromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacterial :Genetic transformation of Escherichia coliby R-factorDNA J.Proc Natl Acad Sci,1972,69:2110-2114. 6 DOWER W J,MILLER J F , RUGODULE C W.High efficiency transformation of E.coli by high-voltage electroporation J.NuclAcids Res,1988, 16(23):6127-6145. 7 SOMBROOD J,FRITSCH E F,MANIATIS T.s0 X H L· 2.»2ñ M .Áë , Ó Ô,r.Ø: SÐñ,1992.(上接第56頁(yè))µµs.yN,¤ ¥¹ u, ¡â35 42 dI N¼ ì H, V¨¾ÉT¹¤¥9 Ö. ÉÏ¥I N¼ ì - ù(28 d -) 3ÉÏ ¤,Ðvµs v, 49¤.â ì P¨¥µÉ,¼ ì 3â ù¥Y.OZAWA 9;?C, Tâ ì H - ù¼ ì 3É µ, ì ù ¥( Ë vâ ì a¨,ª ùô“?r, 3Ér.' k9µ Ë »¥²T,¼ ì - ù(28d -) 3É ¤,ª ùÐv Àµµs. V ? ®¿ Îr!sc ,gA ¨ 4 ¡¼ ì 3ɳ1,9 V ? Ъ V¥ ¯cµBtÅþÉ îÁ, 8ðy b#.' kÏ ÀC ì ¼ ìÛÄC, ª üÕC ®¿ ê ¥,îèÐ7 Ï Õy ͵1µ¿ÉBùî. IÓD: 1 ç£, Á ü,Û .­,©. vÑ â ìÉ¥Ê ¥# ØÄ+ùî J. j<ýñÐ,1998,14(2):192-197. 2 äÍ <,fò ¼,¦ i,©.I NýÌÄâ ì !?ÉÐg ¥1ùî J. j<ýñÐ,1998, 14(3):177-181. 3 !® ¼, äÍ <. ª ØÄÉ¥MÄ# ¼ ì¥Y J. 2 j<vÐÐ,2001,35(1):66-70. 4 Ù Û Û,±¥, Ù T +,©. R¼ µÉ v ¡ ¨rT¥ùî J. + j<vÐÐ,2000,31(2):93-95. 5 ð *, äÍ <,fò ¼.Ég ¥ZÛ(¼ ì 3É¥Y J. 2 j<vÐÐ, 2002,36(1):70-74. 6 WORRALR.Compostingwood wastes forpottingmixes J.Australian Horticulture, 1985,9:34-37 7 POKORNY FA.Pine bark containermedia-an overview J.ProcInt Plant Prop Soc, 1979,29;484-495. 8 YAZAKY Y ,NICHOLS D.Phytotoxic components of pinus radiata bark J.Austr For Res,1978, 8:185-198. 9 OZAWA K, YAMAMUREM, OKADA M.Rice-chaff and soil composite asa culturemedium forvegetable seedlings J.Acta.Horti-culture,1992,319:407-412.